Suicide is not the search for death, it is the search for a kind of life that people do not find here on earth. Suicide in itself is a clearly understood message.
Which one? “I don’t feel good in this world, I don’t feel good here: I want to go somewhere else and feel better.”
Table of Contents
Suicide is strictly linked to the deepest questioning of life: it embraces the past, present and future, in a desperate attempt to find the solution that the person is unable to detect.
In fact, we should not speak of suicide when we speak of people who voluntarily disappear from this world. They don’t want to end up nowhere. Nihilism is not the engine of suicidal people. What they want, on the contrary, is fullness.
Thinking that it is impossible to find it where they are, they simply push the exit door. Just like people caught in a wave of fire rush out: regardless of what they will find outside. It won’t for sure be worse than inside.
They most often leave letters. If they really wanted to plunge into the void, the impact of their actions on those who will remain on earth would not affect them at all. Since they care more than ever about people they leave behind, it is evident that, by ending their existence, suicides do not want to disrupt their personal relationships with living beings, on the contrary, they want to strengthen them.
What they are counting on is that their death will attract the attention of those around them. Sometimes, before they die, they put on a spectacular performance to get noticed and deliver their final, most important message, which is primarily not about death but a better life.
The bottom line is that if we want to better understand the world we live in, we should first examine the motives for suicide very carefully
What do statistics say about it?
The CDC reports that between 2007 and 2017, suicide rates among teenagers and young adults rose 56 percent. Comments on this phenomenon say that even specialists are confused: they do not understand why this is happening.
The answer to the question seems transparent: young people commit suicide because not even specialists understand them. If it wasn’t the case, if somewhere they could find understanding, why would they commit suicide?
Young people’s suicide is not absurd; those who think it is absurd are absurd.
Psychologists who explain that adolescents have psychological problems are like doctors who say the patient is sick – otherwise he would not need the doctor -.
Real causes are not addressed, only symptoms are treated without ever asking why those symptoms are occurring.
Stopping at the symptom, at the sign, is like stopping at the word “table” instead of looking for the real table, the thing itself.
It is not the denial of life that determines people to commit suicide, it is the cause of such denial. Suicide is a sign related to the cause it came from.
Treating the symptom in itself: the depression, the rejection of life, is like breaking the thermometer to cure fever.
Before analyzing the phenomenon – not that of adolescents who commit suicide, and therefore try to get their message across, but rather that of specialists unable to understand adolescents – we must see if others than them put a message in a bottle and throw it overboard, in other words, if others use suicide as a means of communication.
The National Center for Health Statistics reports that suicide rates among women rose by 50 percent from 2000 to 2016, while suicide rates among men rose by just 21 percent over the same period.
Of course, in this case too, “specialists” have no idea why this is happening.
A third category of people who at first glance does not seem to be related to the previous ones, and yet is, are farmers
Everywhere, regardless of nationality, farmers have something in common: a close connection to the real world. Mocked by city dwellers for being naive, they have the common sense that is the barometer of real culture.
Let’s look at some countries. Especially the United States. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that farm suicide rates are twice the national average.
Let’s move to Asia now. In India, an agricultural country by and large – 70 percent of the population depends on agriculture – farm suicide rates have increased exponentially since 1990. In the only state of Maharashtra, the second largest state in India, there were 10 suicides a day by farmers in 2014 1. Rates could be much higher in real terms as allegations are made against the government manipulating statistical data.
Such a phenomenon also affects Europe. In France there is a peasant suicide every other day, according to “Le Figaro”. 2
What do young people, women and farmers have in common? Their realism: Young people are tied to the real world as it should be.
We call them idealists and when they complain we say they are going through the teenage crisis. Is it really like that? Or are they simply the mirror of what we sweep under the carpet? What is the youth crisis actually?
Adolescents are expected to adapt to the adult world. What is the adult world? The golden rule is this: say something, do the opposite. What is said is very idealistic: it corresponds to what our parents, especially our mother, told us in our early childhood and it goes deep inside us. But believing in this off-season is childish: that’s how the adult world talks to us.
Torn between two universes, that of the Father, who tells us to only pretend to follow the maternal laws by acting in a more “realistic” way which means: in the opposite direction. Say, for example, “peace” and wage war, many teenagers throw in the towel and renounce to life altogether.
What about women who willingly give up their lives? They commit suicide because they do not know their true worth: what is inherent in their femininity. They are the alpha and omega of life: the beginning and the end of life. Instead, women are faced with a meaningless universe: a world where patriarchal values dictate the law, a world where death and quantity are the highest values, while women’s values are life and quality.
What about farmers? They are in direct contact with what we call “Mother Earth“. The earth feeds us just like our mother first did. Because of their direct connection to the prime source of life, second only to our carnal mother, they were the first to experience the consequences of the transition from natural nutrition, which implies natural cultivation to “industrial” one.
The transformation of the earth from a living being to an artificial being subject to patriarchal law, as woman is subject to man, which is an unnatural, artificial way of life.
Woman: highest quality, had to submit to the law of quantity. The result is fatal as quantity kills quality: in the long run, the earth and people: who depend on it, will die.
The message of all suicides is this: We don’t want to live in this world. Such a message, conveyed by suicide, intensified considerably with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the start of a new political era.
What happened in real terms? Before that, there were two hostile fronts in the world, two clearly separated fronts: the Western bloc and the Communist bloc. Both were determined to show each other who was the best.
It is because of this typical spirit of patriarchy, one man wanting to rise above another by power, that the West has stimulated social democracy.
Paradoxically, the result on both fronts has been the opposite of what has been preached. Communism, which aims at the highest equality, has led to the worst inequality. Why? Because the engine of all changes has been switched off: the individual, to prefer the group: the class.
Instead, the highest degree of equality was achieved in the West: To show the traditional enemy, the communists, that capitalism can attain such a comprehensive egalitarianism that communism can only dream of without being able to put it into practice.
With the demise of communism, the West embarked on a meaningless and unlimited expansion in all fields, especially in the cultural realm: whatever people do, they must first think. Women’s values have been neglected in the attempt to eradicate them by replacing quality with quantity: now that the accusing eye of the traditional enemy is no longer there to say “stop”.
Do people want this world? Rising suicide rates around the world tell us the answer is clearly: NO.
Since the end of the Cold War, patriarchal megalomania has seen no obstacles in the transition from natural to artificial. The whole world and all of humanity must be involved in the process.
Technology is ubiquitous, not to contribute to the development of life, but to replace life with what patriarchal values call progressive: the elimination of natural processes for artificial ones. The pinnacle is the artificial production of human beings. All of this to finally get rid of the woman who represents the highest natural value: she can create people herself.
When faced with complaints about an invasive artificial world leaving no room for humans, the usual objection is this: look at the advantages of the technique: people who cannot see, for example, can use the computer to communicate. Of course. Would you like to blind people so that they can better appreciate the functionality of the computer?
Such a question is by no means sarcastic, reality reflects it to a large extent. This is what happens and with devastating consequences when one ceases to be natural to become “artificial” in the name of “patriarchal progress” which is a megalomaniac delirium.
If you stop walking, stop using your legs, and continue to sit, there is a very good chance that your legs will weaken after a while. Certainly they are not as fit as if you were using them naturally on a regular basis: all the time. In the end, you will likely have a lot of fun on the wheelchair: you can move from here to there.
Is this the kind of world we want: the desert of feminine values? The triumph of the patriarchal, the artificial? Certainly not.
The suicide in more and more young people, of those who are the elixir of life, shows us how life has become a contradiction: suffocated at its beginning, it turns to death. Of course Nature doesn’t commit suicide, it is the killing perversion of patriarchy that turns life into death.
How does the process unfold? Adolescents have a great need to exercise their physical and mental faculties. What happens? As we see every day on our streets and even in schools, smartphones and electronic devices of all kinds, are regularly used disproportionately – at least in 90% of cases. They replace human relationships with other living beings with inanimate machines. It interferes with their natural approach to themselves and to others: to the world.
They don’t perceive reality directly, they do it through an artificial screen, which makes them lose consciousness of who they really are and what other people are.
It is no coincidence that telephones are called “smart phones”, which leads to the idea that phones are “smart”: able to think, to reason. When, in fact, they are a pure product of human intelligence, and only operate on data created exclusively by the human intellect.https://wonoman.com/is-artificial-intelligence-really-intelligent/#more-94
As in the example above on the legs: if you don’t use them, they will be paralyzed. It is the same with our brain. The more dynamic something is, the more it is influenced by forced inaction. And yet, nothing is faster and more dynamic than our intelligence, which is why it is severely affected by a forced immobility: the “kidnapping” of our brain by artificial devices, the misuse of which causes a reversal: human beings, who should use machines as tools have become tools of machines.
The most common response to this type of objection is that the internet is very useful for people with disabilities. Counter-objection: Firefighters are also very helpful. Hope you do not recommend that someone set the house on fire and then call the fire department to demonstrate that it is very useful.
As we can observe here and elsewhere: In similar situations, the rational, therefore positive, use of a mechanical device is always emphasized, while its improper use is ignored or minimized. The latter, however: abuse is the absolute rule, not an exception, as the constant, universal use of smartphones shows. The fire bell couldn’t be more useful in the event of a fire. What if the fire bell rings all the time?
Patriarchy, as already pointed out, confuses quantity and quality. Machines are quantitative in nature. Human beings are qualitative in nature. Machines are only welcome if they are subject to human needs. If, in charge to decide what human needs are, you put Machines, we are very likely to fall into chaos, which is the case now.
In other words, to prevent suicide as to solve any other type of problem, measures are taken according to quantitative criteria while human beings are qualitative entities. To give an example, if you pierce someone’s heart with a knife, the heart can only be one percent of the person, despite this, the person certainly dies. Mostly objections to the poor quality are dealt with by statistics: mechanical data, when a comprehensive understanding is needed, which only human beings are capable of.
Such a shift has its origin, one could say, in an “inorganic” conception of the world and of people. You can’t take a foot off a person here, a hand over there: from another person, and in the end build a new living being. This is only possible with machines in a factory.
Contemporary man is engaged in the transformation of the whole world into a mega factory producing parts which should replace natural parts. It is a war against the organic, against nature: against the woman who creates living beings, “produces whole entities”, not spare parts. What one can do with a machine, one cannot do it with living beings.
21st century feminism suggests overturning the overturned boat by holding people accountable for their own affairs and for every matter, thus replacing dead objects. This is to give way to women’s values replacing the patriarchal values. Only such capsizing can pull suicides back and then make them go away
Sensitive humans, open to the world, ready to engage in qualitative actions while finding the door closed, can no longer endure this kind of life. If they had the possibility of living in a coherent world, the one we are taught when we are children, the world of women, it is certain that they would never commit suicide. What they are looking for in the afterlife is the realm where women and their ideals are sovereign: if they had it here, why would they throw themselves into the void?
Like what you see ? Join the conversation ! Details can be found by clicking here https://wonoman.com/contact/
In Woman and Transcendence 6, we'll explore why we fear death. How life’s value: woman's…
In Part 7 we ask why virtuality is ubiquitous. "Virtual" and "real" cannot coexist: where…
In part 1 we scrutinize how Mary breaks all taboos. How did patriarchy transform the…
Do patients need doctors or do doctors need patients? Patients are held hostage in a…
In part 4, we’ll analyze how economy is the patriarchy dream factory: to subdue the…
In part 3, we explore death penalty cons and pros. Criminal justice by condemning to…